ArticleCells2026
Nucleosome Clustering as a Biomarker and Mechanistic Switch for Reprogramming Cells.
Article in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear mechanotransduction: tools for mechanical perturbation and chromatin characterization.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2026Review
- Correction: Xu et al. Nucleosome Clustering as a Biomarker and Mechanistic Switch for Reprogramming Cells.Cells · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromatin architecture is highly dynamic, undergoing nanoscale rearrangements throughout the cell cycle and in response to environmental cues. In this study, we employed high-resolution stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) to visualize chromatin organization and cellular plasticity at the nanoscale in two osteosarcoma cell lines, U2OS and MG63. To promote a tumor-suppressive bone microenvironment, we applied three biophysical modalities, namely mechanical vibration, electrical stimulation, and optical pulses, each previously linked to altered tumor behavior by reprogramming cells and generating induced tumor-suppressing (iTS) cells. These stimuli enlarged nuclear size and disrupted nuclear envelope integrity, as revealed by increased surface roughness. Critically, all three modalities transiently scattered nucleosome clusters, indicating chromatin decondensation as a hallmark of iTS cell generation. iTS cells exhibited elevated expression of histone demethylases lysine demethylase 3A (KDM3A) and lysine demethylase 4 (KDM4), accompanied by reduced levels of trimethylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me3). Consistently, pharmacological agents-Trichostatin A as a histone deacetylase inhibitor and chaetocin as a histone methyltransferase inhibitor-induced nucleosome scattering and converted U2OS cells into iTS cells, whose conditioned media exerted tumor-suppressive effects. Our findings highlight nucleosome clustering as a key epigenetic feature responsive to both biophysical and chemical cues, underscoring its role in microscale chromatin remodeling and reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.