Evidence mapPaperPMID 41598218Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Systematic Review: Exploring Inter-Species Variability in Diabetes Mellitus for Translational Medicine.

Luminița Diana Hrițcu, Vasile Boghian, Geta Pavel, Teodor Daniel Hrițcu, Florin Nechifor, Alexandru Spataru, Alexandra Andreea Cherșunaru, Alexandru Munteanu, Manuela Ciocoiu, Mihaela-Claudia Spataru

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luminița Diana HrițcuFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ion Ionescu de la Brad Iasi University of Life Science, 700489 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1944-8142
Vasile BoghianFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ion Ionescu de la Brad Iasi University of Life Science, 700489 Iasi, Romania.
Geta PavelFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ion Ionescu de la Brad Iasi University of Life Science, 700489 Iasi, Romania.
Teodor Daniel HrițcuFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ion Ionescu de la Brad Iasi University of Life Science, 700489 Iasi, Romania.
Florin NechiforFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ion Ionescu de la Brad Iasi University of Life Science, 700489 Iasi, Romania.
Alexandru SpataruFaculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Alexandra Andreea CherșunaruFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ion Ionescu de la Brad Iasi University of Life Science, 700489 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0009-0006-2456-0899
Alexandru MunteanuFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ion Ionescu de la Brad Iasi University of Life Science, 700489 Iasi, Romania.
Manuela CiocoiuFaculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9240-2175
Mihaela-Claudia SpataruFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ion Ionescu de la Brad Iasi University of Life Science, 700489 Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interspecies variability in diabetes mellitus (DM) represents a critical challenge for translational medicine, as metabolic pathways, pancreatic architecture, and therapeutic responses differ substantially across animal models. This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesized evidence from 86 eligible studies published between 2001 and 2025. Comparative data from rodents, dogs, cats, pigs, non-human primates, and humans were analyzed to identify species-specific patterns in insulin secretion, insulin resistance (IR), β-cell dysfunction, microbiota-metabolism interactions, and susceptibility to diabetic complications. Results indicate that spontaneous diabetes in dogs closely mirrors human type 1 diabetes (T1DM), whereas feline obesity-associated diabetes reflects key features of human type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Rodent models remain essential for mechanistic and genetic studies but show limited chronicity and lower predictive fidelity for long-term outcomes. Non-human primates exhibit the highest physiological similarity to humans, especially regarding β-cell structure and incretin response, supporting their role in advanced translational studies. Major limitations included methodological heterogeneity and inconsistent molecular reporting. Integrating spontaneous models with standardized protocols and multi-omics approaches enhances translational relevance and supports more accurate model selection in diabetes research.

Indexed as

animal modelscomparative medicinegut microbiotametabolic diseaseOne Healthβ-cell dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID41598218
PMCPMC12843455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.