ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Biofeedback Fixation Training in the Rehabilitation of Patients with Geographic Atrophy.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geographic atrophy (GA) is a progressive cause of central vision loss with limited rehabilitation options. This prospective case series aimed to evaluate the effects of biofeedback fixation training (BFT) on visual function and vision-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with GA. Eighteen patients with total central vision loss in one eye underwent BFT on the fellow eye (study eye) using the Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) system, which was used to select a new, previously chosen preferred retinal locus (PRL) to stabilize fixation or adopt a new fixation locus. Patients were followed for an average of 13.2 months (range 3-26 months). Functional outcomes included best corrected visual acuity (ETDRS chart), reading performance (Radner test), and contrast sensitivity (Spot Checks test). MAIA parameters comprised average retinal sensitivity, fixation distance and stability (P1, P2), and changes in the bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA). Vision-related quality of life was assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25). Following BFT, visual acuity, reading ability and contrast sensitivity improved significantly (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.