ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Gaps in Current Cardiometabolic Risk Assessment: A Review Supporting the Development of the C.O.R.E. Indicator Model.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ten-year cardiometabolic progression and health-related quality of life in individuals with isolated abdominal obesity.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity is a multidimensional condition characterized by autonomic imbalance, metabolic inflexibility, impaired physical resilience, and ectopic adiposity, pathophysiological alterations that arise long before overt cardiometabolic disease becomes clinically detectable. Despite this, current cardiometabolic risk scores continue to rely predominantly on biochemical and anthropometric variables, such as BMI, waist circumference, glucose, and lipid levels. While these markers are practical, inexpensive, and validated across large population cohorts, growing evidence shows that they offer limited incremental predictive value and fail to capture early functional and structural abnormalities. The recent literature highlights the prognostic importance of autonomic dysfunction, reduced metabolic flexibility, diminished cardiorespiratory fitness, impaired muscular strength, and ectopic fat depots including visceral and epicardial adiposity, independently of the traditional anthropometric indices. The domains remain absent from traditional algorithms such as the Metabolic Syndrome criteria, the Framingham Risk Score, and SCORE2. As a result, cardiometabolic risk is frequently underestimated in key subgroups, including young adults with obesity, individuals with high visceral adiposity but normal BMI, those with subclinical myocardial dysfunction, and metabolically unhealthy normal-weight phenotypes. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on obesity-related cardiometabolic impairment, highlights major gaps in established risk scores, and supports the conceptual development of the C.O.R.E. (Cardio-Obesity Risk Evaluation) Indicator Model-a hypothesis-generating, non-validated multidomain framework integrating autonomic, metabolic, functional, and structural markers to enable earlier risk phenotyping in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.