ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Aortic Valve Stenosis: Progress from Diagnosis to Treatment.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Cutoff Values of Aortic Valve Coefficient (AVC) in Relation to Aortic-Valve Area and Calcium Score: A Patient-Level Analysis.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Article
- Echocardiographic assessment of left atrial structure and function in severe aortic stenosis with preserved vs. reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease in Western countries and it is especially associated with older age. With its progressive course, AS leads to ventricular hypertrophy, impaired diastolic and systolic function, and symptomatic deterioration. The natural history of AS is closely linked to the extent of myocardial and extracardiac damage in association with the patients comorbidities. Diagnosis relies primarily on transthoracic echocardiography, which assesses valve morphology, quantifies stenosis severity, and evaluates cardiac remodeling. However, discordant grading is frequent, necessitating advanced imaging to clarify the severity and the mechanism of the stenosis and stratify risk. Treatment is predominantly interventional, as no medical therapy is able to stop disease progression. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are the two treatment options. Special clinical scenarios-such as cardiogenic shock or concomitant cardiac amyloidosis-pose additional diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and require individualized, multidisciplinary management. Overall, contemporary AS care increasingly integrates multimodality imaging, refined risk stratification, and tailored interventional strategies to optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.