ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Current Evidence from Animal Models on Molecular Changes Underlying Antidepressant Effects of Psychobiotics.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The treatment of depression is an uphill battle due to the low efficiency and delayed clinical response of antidepressants and the fact that most of them cause numerous side effects. Psychobiotics, probiotics that affect brain function and confer mental health benefits, emerged as a promising ally showing protective effects against depressive- and anxiety-like behaviors in various animal models of depression. There is rapidly accumulating evidence that psychobiotics show protective effects at the molecular level as well, affecting several pathophysiological processes implicated in depression. This narrative review summarizes preclinical insights into molecular changes related to the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, peripheral inflammation, neuroinflammation, neurotransmission and tryptophan metabolism underlying psychobiotic-driven mitigation of depressive and anxiety symptoms in stress-based, corticosterone-induced and inflammation-induced animal models of depression. Research evidence indicates that psychobiotics normalize the activity of the HPA axis, decrease levels of inflammatory mediators in the intestine, circulation, and brain, normalize the levels of neurotransmitters and their receptors, and regulate tryptophan metabolism in various animal models of depression. The main setbacks in this field are the extensive diversity of studied probiotic strains, which are often insufficiently characterized, and the lack of mechanistic studies in animal models. However, despite these challenges, further study of psychobiotics in the pursuit of supportive therapies for depressive disorders is firmly grounded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.