ReviewPolymers2026
Advanced Design Concepts for Shape-Memory Polymers in Biomedical Applications and Soft Robotics.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermally Activated Shape-Memory Behavior of SLA-Printed PDMS-PCLDMA Hybrid Networks.Polymers · 2026Article
- Thermomechanical Tailoring of a DLP-Printable Shape Memory Polyurethane for Vascular Graft Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shape-memory polymers (SMPs) are a class of smart materials capable of recovering their original shape from a programmed temporary shape in response to external stimuli such as heat, light, or magnetic fields. SMPs have attracted significant interest for biomedical devices and soft robotics due to their large recoverable strains, programmable mechanical and thermal properties, tunable activation temperatures, responsiveness to various stimuli, low density, and ease of processing via additive manufacturing techniques, as well as demonstrated biocompatibility and potential bioresorbability. This review summarises recent progress in the fundamentals, classification, activation mechanisms, and fabrication strategies of SMPs, focusing particularly on design principles that influence performance relevant to specific applications. Both thermally and non-thermally activated SMP systems are discussed, alongside methods for controlling activation temperatures, including plasticisation, copolymerisation, and modulation of cross-linking density. The use of functional nanofillers to enhance thermal and electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, and actuation efficiency is also considered. Current manufacturing techniques are critically evaluated in terms of resolution, material compatibility, scalability, and integration potential. Biodegradable SMPs are highlighted, with discussion of degradation behaviour, biocompatibility, and demonstrations in devices such as haemostatic foams, embolic implants, and bone scaffolds. However, despite their promising potential, the widespread application of SMPs faces several challenges, including non-uniform activation, the need to balance mechanical strength with shape recovery, and limited standardisation. Addressing these issues is critical for advancing SMPs from laboratory research to clinical and industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.