Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41599541›Full record

ReviewPolymers2026

Sustainable Polyurethane Systems: Integrating Green Synthesis and Closed-Loop Recovery.

Tae Hui Kim, Hyeong Seo Kim, Sang-Ho Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tae Hui KimDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea.
Hyeong Seo KimDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Ho LeeDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy RS-2025-25435993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyurethanes (PUs) are indispensable polymeric materials widely employed across diverse industrial sectors due to their excellent thermal stability, chemical resistance, adhesion, and mechanical durability. However, the intrinsic three-dimensional crosslinked network that underpins their performance also presents a fundamental barrier to reprocessing and recycling. Consequently, most end-of-life PU waste is currently managed through landfilling or incineration, resulting in significant resource loss and environmental impact. To address these challenges, this review presents an integrated perspective on sustainable PU systems by unifying green synthesis strategies with closed-loop recovery approaches. First, recent advances in bio-based polyols and phosgene-free isocyanate synthesis derived from renewable resources-such as plant oils, carbohydrates, and lignin-are discussed as viable means to reduce dependence on petrochemical feedstocks and mitigate toxicity concerns. Next, emerging chemical recycling methodologies, including acidolysis and aminolysis, are reviewed with a focus on the selective recovery of high-purity monomers. Finally, PU vitrimers and dynamic covalent polymer networks (DCPNs) based on urethane bond exchange reactions are examined as reprocessable architectures that combine thermoplastic-like processability with the mechanical robustness of thermosets. By integrating synthesis, recovery, and reuse within a unified framework, this review aims to outline a coherent pathway toward establishing a sustainable circular economy for PU materials.

Indexed as

bio-based polyols and isocyanateschemical recyclingclosed-loop materials designdynamic covalent networksgreen synthesispolyurethane vitrimersustainable polyurethanes

Identifiers

PMID41599541
PMCPMC12845814

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.