ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Biomolecule-Photosensitizer Conjugates: A Strategy to Enhance Selectivity and Therapeutic Efficacy in Photodynamic Therapy.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Approaches and Emerging Strategies in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Photodynamic Therapy Combined with Anticancer Drug Therapy in the Treatment of Malignant Neoplasms.Cells · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomolecule-photosensitizer conjugates have rapidly evolved into one of the most powerful strategies for improving the selectivity, efficacy, and translational potential of photodynamic therapy (PDT). By integrating photosensitizers (PSs) with carbohydrates, amino acids, peptides, aptamers, proteins, cofactors, vitamins or antibodies, these constructs overcome long-standing limitations of classical PDT, including poor solubility, insufficient tumour accumulation, and strong dependence on oxygen availability. Beyond enhancing receptor-mediated uptake and enabling precise interactions with the tumour microenvironment (TME), bioconjugation also modulates aggregation, photochemical properties, intracellular accumulation, and immune system activation. A particularly transformative trend is the emergence of supramolecular architectures in which photosensitizers form defined nanostructured aggregates with peptides or proteins. Once considered an undesirable phenomenon, aggregation is now recognized as a tenable feature that governs photochemical behaviour. Engineered aggregates can undergo environment-triggered disassembly to monomeric, photoactive states, or operate as semiconductor-like nanodomains capable of Type I reaction through symmetry-breaking charge separation. This shift toward oxygen-independent radical pathways offers a promising solution to the challenge of hypoxia, a hallmark of the TME that severely compromises conventional Type II PDT. Parallel advances in 3D experimental platforms such as tumour organoids and organ-on-chip systems provide physiologically relevant validation of these conjugates, enabling the assessment of penetration, subcellular localization, immunogenic cell death, and therapeutic synergy within realistic TME conditions. Collectively, the integration of biomolecular targeting with controlled supramolecular design is redefining the landscape of PDT. Future progress will depend on designing conjugates that retain high activity under hypoxia, engineering dynamic aggregate states, and systematically validating these systems in advanced TME-mimetic models. Together, these developments position biomolecule-photosensitizer conjugates as a versatile and increasingly less oxygen-dependent class of next-generation phototherapeutic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.