Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41599762›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Modelling for Precision Dosing of Immunosuppressants in Kidney Transplantation.

Sholpan Altynova, Timur Saliev, Aruzhan Asanova, Zhanna Kozybayeva, Saltanat Rakhimzhanova, Aidos Bolatov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sholpan AltynovaDepartment of Medical and Regulatory Affairs, Corporate Fund "University Medical Center", Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Timur SalievInstitute for Fundamental and Applied Medical Research, S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-6363
Aruzhan AsanovaDepartment of Science, Corporate Fund "University Medical Center", Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-3886-9268
Zhanna KozybayevaClinical Academic Department of Internal Medicine, Corporate Fund "University Medical Center", Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Saltanat RakhimzhanovaClinical Academic Department of Paediatrics, Corporate Fund "University Medical Center", Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Aidos BolatovDepartment of Science, Corporate Fund "University Medical Center", Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-5390-4623

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan Grant No. AP26101153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing immunosuppressant dosing presents significant challenges in kidney transplantation due to narrow therapeutic ranges and considerable inter-patient pharmacokinetic differences. Emerging strategies for precision dosing, encompassing Bayesian population pharmacokinetic models, pharmacogenomic integration, and artificial intelligence algorithms, aim to enhance drug monitoring by moving beyond traditional trough-based approaches. This review critically assesses available evidence for predictive dosing models targeting immunosuppressants, including calcineurin inhibitors, antimetabolites, and mTOR inhibitors in kidney transplant patients. Available observational and simulation studies demonstrate substantial methodological diversity, with Bayesian PopPK-guided strategies showing 15-35% better target exposure achievement compared to trough-based monitoring. The absence of pooled estimates precludes a precise summary effect size, and evidence from randomized controlled trials remains limited. Machine learning models, particularly for tacrolimus, frequently reduced prediction error relative to traditional regression approaches, but substantial heterogeneity in study design, outcome definitions, and external validation limits quantitative synthesis. Hybrid Bayesian-AI frameworks and explainable AI tools show conceptual promise but are largely supported by proof-of-concept studies rather than reproducible clinical implementations. Overall, Bayesian pharmacokinetic modelling represents the most mature and clinically interpretable approach for precision dosing in transplantation, whereas AI-driven and hybrid systems remain investigational. Key gaps include the need for standardized reporting, rigorous risk-of-bias assessment, prospective validation, and clearer regulatory and implementation pathways to support safe and equitable clinical adoption.

Indexed as

antimetabolitesartificial intelligence (AI)Bayesian pharmacokineticcalcineurin inhibitorsdrug monitoringkidney transplantationmachine learningmTOR inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID41599762
PMCPMC12845158

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.