ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Modelling for Precision Dosing of Immunosuppressants in Kidney Transplantation.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urinary Biomarkers in Urological Oncology: From Biological Origin to Clinical Decision-Making-A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Inflammaging-Redox-InflammamiR Axis in Metabolic Aging: From Diagnostic Clusters to Integrated Risk Phenotypes.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Pharmacogenomics and Epigenetic Regulation Transforming Pediatric Precision Therapeutics.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction: Functional Immune Profiling in Transplantation and Beyond.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Protocol-constrained AI enhances tacrolimus dosing accuracy in kidney transplant care.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimizing immunosuppressant dosing presents significant challenges in kidney transplantation due to narrow therapeutic ranges and considerable inter-patient pharmacokinetic differences. Emerging strategies for precision dosing, encompassing Bayesian population pharmacokinetic models, pharmacogenomic integration, and artificial intelligence algorithms, aim to enhance drug monitoring by moving beyond traditional trough-based approaches. This review critically assesses available evidence for predictive dosing models targeting immunosuppressants, including calcineurin inhibitors, antimetabolites, and mTOR inhibitors in kidney transplant patients. Available observational and simulation studies demonstrate substantial methodological diversity, with Bayesian PopPK-guided strategies showing 15-35% better target exposure achievement compared to trough-based monitoring. The absence of pooled estimates precludes a precise summary effect size, and evidence from randomized controlled trials remains limited. Machine learning models, particularly for tacrolimus, frequently reduced prediction error relative to traditional regression approaches, but substantial heterogeneity in study design, outcome definitions, and external validation limits quantitative synthesis. Hybrid Bayesian-AI frameworks and explainable AI tools show conceptual promise but are largely supported by proof-of-concept studies rather than reproducible clinical implementations. Overall, Bayesian pharmacokinetic modelling represents the most mature and clinically interpretable approach for precision dosing in transplantation, whereas AI-driven and hybrid systems remain investigational. Key gaps include the need for standardized reporting, rigorous risk-of-bias assessment, prospective validation, and clearer regulatory and implementation pathways to support safe and equitable clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.