ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Light Sources in Hyperspectral Imaging Simultaneously Influence Object Detection Performance and Vase Life of Cut Roses.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multispectral Fluorescence Imaging for Fast Identification of Cold Stress in Pepper Plants.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a noncontact camera-based technique that enables deep learning models to learn various plant conditions by detecting light reflectance under illumination. In this study, we investigated the effects of four light sources-halogen (HAL), incandescent (INC), fluorescent (FLU), and light-emitting diodes (LED)-on the quality of spectral images and the vase life (VL) of cut roses, which are vulnerable to abiotic stresses. Cut roses 'All For Love' and 'White Beauty' were used to compare cultivar-specific visible reflectance characteristics associated with contrasting petal pigmentation. HSI was performed at four time points, yielding 640 images per light source from 40 cut roses. The results revealed that the light source strongly affected both the image quality (mAP@0.5 60-80%) and VL (0-3 d) of cut roses. The HAL lamp produced high-quality spectral images across wavelengths (WL) ranging from 480 to 900 nm and yielded the highest object detection performance (ODP), reaching mAP@0.5 of 85% in 'All For Love' and 83% in 'White Beauty' with the YOLOv11x models. However, it increased petal temperature by 2.7-3 °C, thereby stimulating leaf transpiration and consequently shortening the VL of the flowers by 1-2.5 d. In contrast, INC produced unclear images with low spectral signals throughout the WL and consequently resulted in lower ODP, with mAP@0.5 of 74% and 69% in 'All For Love' and 'White Beauty', respectively. The INC only slightly increased petal temperature (1.2-1.3 °C) and shortened the VL by 1 d in the both cultivars. Although FLU and LED had only minor effects on petal temperature and VL, these illuminations generated transient spectral peaks in the WL range of 480-620 nm, resulting in decreased ODP (mAP@0.5 60-75%). Our results revealed that HAL provided reliable, high-quality spectral image data and high object detection accuracy, but simultaneously had negative effects on flower quality. Our findings suggest an alternative two-phase approach for illumination applications that uses HAL during the initial exploration of spectra corresponding to specific symptoms of interest, followed by LED for routine plant monitoring. Optimizing illumination in HSI will improve the accuracy of deep learning-based prediction and thereby contribute to the development of an automated quality sorting system that is urgently required in the cut flower industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.