Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600314›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Toward Objective Assessment of Positive Affect: EEG and HRV Indices Distinguishing High and Low Arousal Positive Affect.

Yuri Nakagawa, Tipporn Laohakangvalvit, Toshitaka Matsubara, Keiko Tagai, Midori Sugaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuri NakagawaFunctional Control Systems, Shibaura Institute of Technology Graduated School, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan.
Tipporn LaohakangvalvitCollege of Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3371-2966
Toshitaka MatsubaraMIRAI Technology Institute, Shiseido Co., Ltd., 1-2-11 Takashima, Nishi-ku, Yokohama 220-0011, Kanagawa, Japan.
Keiko TagaiMIRAI Technology Institute, Shiseido Co., Ltd., 1-2-11 Takashima, Nishi-ku, Yokohama 220-0011, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7349-1988
Midori SugayaCollege of Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3297-5913

Funding

Shiseido Co. Ltd, 23103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive affect comprises distinct affective states that differ in arousal level, such as high-arousal positive affect (HAPA) and low-arousal positive affect (LAPA), which have been shown to be associated with different effects and effective contexts. In studies of positive affect, it is therefore important not only to assess overall positivity but also to distinguish between different types of positive affect. Existing assessments rely mainly on self-reports, which may be unreliable for individuals with limited self-report abilities. The aim of this study was to examine whether physiological indices can discriminate between HAPA and LAPA. Participants were presented with eight video stimuli designed to elicit either HAPA or LAPA, and self-report measures were used as manipulation checks to define the affective conditions, while heart rate variability (HRV) and electroencephalography (EEG) were recorded. HRV indices did not show significant differences between the two affective conditions. In contrast, analyses of EEG relative power revealed significant differences between the HAPA and LAPA conditions. These findings demonstrate that, under the present experimental conditions, physiological differences between low- and high-arousal positive affect can be captured in EEG signals using relative power, a simple and reproducible analytical index, whereas no such differences were observed in HRV indices.

Indexed as

AffectArousalElectroencephalographyHeart RateAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEEGheart rate variabilitypositive affect

Identifiers

PMID41600314
PMCPMC12846082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.