ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Toward Objective Assessment of Positive Affect: EEG and HRV Indices Distinguishing High and Low Arousal Positive Affect.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Positive affect comprises distinct affective states that differ in arousal level, such as high-arousal positive affect (HAPA) and low-arousal positive affect (LAPA), which have been shown to be associated with different effects and effective contexts. In studies of positive affect, it is therefore important not only to assess overall positivity but also to distinguish between different types of positive affect. Existing assessments rely mainly on self-reports, which may be unreliable for individuals with limited self-report abilities. The aim of this study was to examine whether physiological indices can discriminate between HAPA and LAPA. Participants were presented with eight video stimuli designed to elicit either HAPA or LAPA, and self-report measures were used as manipulation checks to define the affective conditions, while heart rate variability (HRV) and electroencephalography (EEG) were recorded. HRV indices did not show significant differences between the two affective conditions. In contrast, analyses of EEG relative power revealed significant differences between the HAPA and LAPA conditions. These findings demonstrate that, under the present experimental conditions, physiological differences between low- and high-arousal positive affect can be captured in EEG signals using relative power, a simple and reproducible analytical index, whereas no such differences were observed in HRV indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.