ArticleToxics2026
In Silico Hazard Assessment of Ototoxicants Through Machine Learning and Computational Systems Biology.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals across their lifespan may experience hearing loss from medications or chemicals, prompting concern about ototoxic environmental exposures. This study applies computational modeling as a screening-level hazard identification and chemical prioritization approach and is not intended to constitute a human health risk assessment or to estimate exposure- or dose-dependent ototoxic risk. We evaluated in silico drug-induced ototoxicity models on 80 environmental chemicals, excluding 4 with known ototoxicity, and analyzed 76 chemicals using fingerprinting, similarity assessment, and machine learning classification. We compared predicted environmental ototoxicants with ototoxic drugs, paired select polychlorinated biphenyls with the antineoplastic drug mitotane, and used PCB 177 as a case study to construct an ototoxicity pathway. A systems biology framework predicted and compared molecular targets of mitotane and PCB 177 to generate a network-level mechanism. The consensus model (accuracy 0.95 test; 0.90 validation) identified 18 of 76 chemicals as potential ototoxicants within acceptable confidence ranges. Mitotane and PCB 177 were both predicted to disrupt thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor signaling, suggesting thyroid-mediated pathways may contribute to auditory harm; additional targets included AhR, transthyretin, and PXR. Findings indicate overlapping mechanisms involving metabolic, cellular, and inflammatory processes. This work shows that integrated computational modeling can support virtual screening and prioritization for chemical and drug ototoxicity risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.