ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Optimal interphase delay in biphasic current pulses facilitates neural circuit activation induced by microstimulation in the mouse visual cortex.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Machine Learning-Based Decoder Framework for the Cortical Voltage-Sensitive Dye Responses to Retinal Neuromorphic Microstimulation: A Proof-of-Concept Simulation Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cathodic-first biphasic current pulses are commonly employed in intracortical microstimulation. Due to the intricate arrangement of axons, somata, and dendrites in the cerebral cortex, membrane polarizations induced by the cathodic and subsequent anodic phases of biphasic pulses may interact in a location-, magnitude-, and timing-dependent manner. Introducing an interphase delay between the two phases has been proposed to mitigate counteracting interactions between these membrane polarizations. Previous clinical studies on visual prostheses have demonstrated that such a delay lowers the stimulus threshold required for percept induction. However, despite this functional outcome, direct physiological observations of cathodic-anodic interactions in cortical circuit activation remain limited. Here, we employed voltage-sensitive dye imaging in mouse brain slices to visualize membrane excitation elicited by biphasic current pulses with varying interphase delays. The results demonstrated that an optimal interphase delay nonlinearly facilitated cortical circuit activation in response to both single and repetitive pulses. At 10 μA/phase and 200 μs/phase, the biphasic pulse elicited larger excitation with a 500-600-μs interphase delay than with shorter or longer delays or the cathodic monophasic pulse. At 20 μA/phase, the cathodic monophasic pulse and biphasic pulses with interphase delays > 800 μs elicited larger excitation than all other conditions. Pharmacological experiments suggested that trans-synaptic excitation contributes to this facilitative effect. These findings provide evidence that an optimally timed cathodic-anodic interaction enhances cortical circuit activation, beyond simply negating opposing phase effects. Such timing optimization of stimulus pulses may improve neural recruitment efficiency while minimizing charge delivery, offering insights for intracortical prosthetic design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.