ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Survival and recovery: 24-month outcomes for critically Ill COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) was used for patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term outcomes and quality of life of the surviving patients. Methods: This single-center observational study was performed among patients who were discharged after V-V ECMO treatment with COVID-19 pneumonia. During the 2-year follow-up period, different organ functions and quality of life parameters were evaluated three times after discharge. As a control group, SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients were included. Results: Thirty-five patients underwent V-V ECMO treatment, of whom 11 patients survived. The study population consists of 9 patients for the follow-up (2 patients did not consent to follow-up examinations). On lung CT, the occurrence of residual fibrotic banding was 22% at discharge, and increased to 89% at 24th month follow-up, while lung function tests were normal. On echocardiography, patients had a mildly elevated right ventricle end-diastolic diameter at the post discharge period, which normalized during follow-up (baseline: 37.6 ± 2.9 mm, follow-up: 35.6 ± 2.2 mm, Conclusion: At the 2-year follow-up after discharge from the V-V ECMO treatment, permanent cardio muscular and structural pulmonary damage had been anticipated. However, on one hand, good cardiac and pulmonary function and robust sustained immune response were measured. On the other hand, unforeseen long-term complications arose, such as sleepiness, reduced physical activity, acute depression, and consequently, a deteriorated health related quality of life. These findings highlight the necessity of long-term, structured controlled rehabilitation programs for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.