Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41601890›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Nutritional status of iron and vitamin D in postpartum women in northern Taiwan.

Sing-Chung Li, Yi-Ling Chen, Chiao-Ming Chen, Li-Yi Tsai, Shu-Chi Mu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sing-Chung LiSchool of Nutrition and Health Sciences, College of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Ling ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chiao-Ming ChenDepartment of Food Science, Nutrition, and Nutraceutical Biotechnology, Shih Chien University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li-Yi TsaiDepartment of Pediatrics, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shu-Chi MuDepartment of Pediatrics, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postpartum women are at increased risk of iron and vitamin D deficiencies due to physiological demands, blood loss during delivery, and limited sun exposure during the confinement period. The aimed of this study was to assess the iron and vitamin D nutritional status of women at six weeks postpartum in northern Taiwan and to examine its associations with dietary intake and nutritional supplement use. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 120 women at six weeks postpartum in northern Taiwan. Dietary intake was assessed using 24-h dietary recall, and supplement use was recorded. Hematological and biochemical parameters, including hemoglobin, ferritin, and serum 25(OH)D Results: The prevalence of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia was 5.0% and 6.7%, respectively, while 75% of women exhibited vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency. Supplement users had a significantly lower prevalence of iron deficiency and vitamin D deficiency compared with non-users. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that dietary intake alone is insufficient to meet postpartum micronutrient requirements and that supplementation plays a critical role in maintaining adequate nutritional status. These results highlight the need for targeted nutritional strategies and updated dietary recommendations to support maternal recovery and health after childbirth.

Indexed as

iron deficiencyiron deficiency anemiamaternal nutritionpostpartum womensupplementationvitamin D deficiency

Identifiers

PMID41601890
PMCPMC12832414

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.