ReviewRSC advances2026
Self-assembling nanocomposites for smart drug delivery: towards personalized and stimuli-responsive therapeutics.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Nano-Antibiotics: AI-Guided Stimuli-Responsive Nanoplatforms for Precision Antimicrobial Therapy.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Hydrogel-based delivery systems for cutaneous melanoma therapy: from chemical design and crosslinking strategies to structure-activity relationships.RSC advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-assembling nanocomposites (SANCs) represent a valuable and innovative drug delivery system that facilitates site-specific and stimulus-controlled drug administration. These composites have the capability to self-assemble into stimulus-responsive nanostructures, enabling the effective delivery of a wide range of therapeutic agents, from small molecules to biologics, to specific target sites. This advancement addresses crucial challenges in treating diseases like cancer and chronic inflammatory conditions. In this review, we briefly outline the advantages of SANCs in enhancing bioavailability, reducing systemic toxicity, and maintaining stability under physiological conditions. However, several significant obstacles remain, including challenges related to scalability, stability, storage, biocompatibility, and regulatory approvals that have not been met to obtain clinical applications. Furthermore, we explore the stimuli-responsive and biohybrid materials, as well as the integration of SANCs with artificial intelligence and nanotechnology to create intelligent drug delivery systems. Encouraging contributions for papers that emphasize the role of SANCs in personalized medicine, this review underscores the potential of these nanosystems in developing tailored, patient-specific treatment approaches. By establishing robust policy frameworks and fostering strategic partnerships, SANCs have the potential to usher in a new era of tailored solutions for delivering medications effectively, thereby advancing the field of modern medicine.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.