ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Construction and validation of a predictive model for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction following emergency percutaneous coronary intervention based on novel inflammatory markers.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammation-Mediated Mechanisms of Arrhythmias After Acute Myocardial Infarction.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning for prediction of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention during hospitalization in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multi-center prospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Inflammatory biomarkers are established predictors of outcomes in cardiovascular diseases, yet their accuracy in predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of emerging inflammatory indices for NOAF following PCI in AMI patients and to develop a clinically applicable nomogram. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 509 AMI patients who had no prior history of atrial fibrillation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to determine significant preoperative inflammatory biomarkers and other clinical risk factors associated with NOAF. A predictive nomogram was subsequently created based on these identified factors. The discriminative ability, accuracy of calibration, and clinical utility of the nomogram were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Among the 509 patients studied, 94 (18.5%) experienced NOAF during hospitalization. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that advanced age, increased left atrial diameter (LAD), higher Killip class, log-transformed NT-proBNP and increased systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) independently predicted NOAF risk among AMI patients after PCI. ROC analyses comparing several novel inflammatory indicators, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and SIRI-demonstrated that SIRI exhibited the highest predictive accuracy for NOAF occurrence (AUC: 0.813, 95% CI: 0.739-0.887). Additionally, a nomogram including SIRI was constructed to predict the risk of in-hospital NOAF in AMI patients. The C-index, equivalent to the area under the ROC curve (AUC), was 0.868 (95% CI: 0.821-0.916) in the training cohort and 0.859 (95% CI: 0.793-0.925) in the validation cohort, indicating good discrimination. Calibration plots confirmed good agreement between predicted probabilities and observed outcomes, and decision curve analysis verified substantial clinical benefit. Conclusion: SIRI was identified as the most effective inflammatory biomarker for predicting NOAF in AMI patients following PCI. The constructed nomogram, which incorporates inflammatory indicators, allows rapid and personalized assessment, enabling clinicians to better identify and manage AMI patients at increased risk for NOAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.