ArticleFrontiers in sociology2025
Network analysis of workplace mobbing, work-family conflict, and mental health in adults from the general population.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of the Luxembourg Workplace Mobbing Scale (LWMS): Structural Equation Modeling, and Item Response Theory Evidence.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Workplace mobbing and work-family conflict represent two significant risk factors for mental health in the general adult population. In an increasingly demanding work context, these issues affect workers' psychological well-being, impacting their productivity and quality of life. Objective: To analyze the relationship between workplace mobbing, work-family conflict, and mental health in Peruvian adults employed in both the public and private sectors. Materials and methods: A total of 345 adults participated, with a mean age of 33 years (SD = 9.4). A sociodemographic questionnaire and psychological instruments were applied. An unregularized network modeling and sex-based comparison were conducted. Results: The nodes with the highest centrality and predictability values were depressive symptoms, generalized anxiety, work-family conflict, and family-work conflict. The strongest associations were found between work-family conflict and generalized anxiety, sleep quality, and family-work conflict; between depressive symptoms and generalized anxiety and sleep quality; and between workplace mobbing, family-work conflict, and depressive symptoms. No sex differences were observed. Conclusion: The patterns of association that reflect how these factors coexist within the psychosocial environment of workers. Consequently, it is recommended that organizations implement network structure provides relevant information about the relationships between workplace mobbing, work-family conflict, and mental health. The findings highlight policies that address these associated dynamics, promote work-family balance, and offer psychological support to strengthen overall well-being in the workplace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.