Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41602762›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2025

Broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against influenza A viruses: current insights and future directions.

Nahed N Mahrous, Ohoud S Alhumaidan, Abdulaziz S Alkhoshaiban, Rawan T Tafish, Fatimah F Al-Ghnnam, Maha Althubyani, Abeer Al-Hubaysh, Yahya F Jamous

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nahed N MahrousDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Science, University of Hafr Al-Batin, Hafr Al-Batin, Saudi Arabia.
Ohoud S AlhumaidanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz S AlkhoshaibanUnit of Scientific Research, Applied College, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Rawan T TafishDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, SMC Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah F Al-GhnnamDepartment of Infection and Immunity, Research Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Maha AlthubyaniComparative Medicine Department, Research Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abeer Al-HubayshDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Prince Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yahya F JamousWellness and Preventative Medicine Institute, Health Sector, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become attractive tools for both the treatment and prevention of influenza A viruses due to their ability to target several viral components, which confers broad therapeutic potential. Advances in biotechnology, such as hybridoma technology, phage display technology, B cell immortalization, and artificial intelligence (Al)-driven antibody design, have significantly accelerated the development of effective mAbs. Clinical trials have shown that mAbs can improve clinical outcomes particularly in high-risk and immunocompromised populations by lowering viral loads and reducing disease severity. However, high production costs, the need for intravenous administration, and the risk of viral escape mutations are some of the obstacles to widespread clinical adoption. Post-marketing surveillance serves as a valuable source of information regarding safety, real-world effectiveness, and patterns of resistance. Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs), particularly those directed against conserved regions of the virus's surface proteins, such as hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), have demonstrated efficacy against antigenic drift-derived variants. Nevertheless, the emergence of escape mutants underscores the need for careful monitoring of mAb candidates and combination therapy. Monitoring genomic shifts requires a careful focus on the targeted regions affected by combination therapy. Challenges in accessibility are compounded by financial barriers, emphasizing the importance of large-scale production and alternative delivery methods, such as inhaled mAbs. To ensure that future mAb-based therapies for influenza A are both effective and accessible, it is critical to integrate resistance surveillance tools, monitoring AI, and advanced computational modeling in therapeutic strategies. This comprehensive review discusses the potential of mAbs to enhance influenza A treatment by offering precise and adaptable alternatives to traditional antivirals. It also examines recent technological advances, clinical performance, and scalability that may redefine future therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

antiviral therapybroadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs)influenza A virusmAb resistantmonoclonal antibodies (mAbs)

Identifiers

PMID41602762
PMCPMC12833332

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.