ArticleDigital health
Tele-assessment reliability of functional performance tests in adults with obesity.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obesity is strongly associated with impaired physical function and increased health risks. Functional performance tests such as the Timed Up and Go (TUG), Five Times Sit-to-Stand (5xSTS), and 4-Meter Walk Test (4MWT) are essential for evaluating mobility, strength, and gait speed. Although widely used in clinical practice, the reliability of remote tele-assessment of these tests in adults with obesity remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of tele-assessment compared with face-to-face assessment for commonly used functional performance tests in adults with obesity. Methods: A repeated-measures observational study was conducted with 82 adults with obesity. Participants performed TUG, 5xSTS, and 4MWT tests both in a clinical setting and remotely at home using video-based tele-assessment. Results: Inter-rater reliability was good for TUG (ICC = 0.826) and 5xSTS (ICC = 0.880), and moderate for 4MWT (ICC = 0.743). Intra-rater reliability across two tele-assessments was excellent for TUG (ICC = 0.910) and 5xSTS (ICC = 0.902), and good for 4MWT (ICC = 0.858). Conclusion: Tele-assessment provides a reliable alternative to face-to-face assessment of functional performance tests in adults with obesity. These findings support the integration of remote functional testing into digital health practice, expanding access to mobility and strength evaluations for populations with limited access to in-person care. Clinical Trial Registration: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.