ArticleDigital health
Evaluation of the pragmatic implementation of a digital platform for Chinese caregivers of older adults with chronic diseases.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Informal caregivers of older adults with serious health conditions, particularly stroke, dementia, and fractures, often experience substantial caregiving stress. Online platforms may offer an accessible and effective means of supporting caregivers and reducing stress. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed online platform in reducing caregiver stress and enhancing caregiver preparedness and competence. It also examined factors associated with platform use, as well as user satisfaction and engagement. Methods: A longitudinal open-trial design was employed, with assessments conducted at baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 15-month follow-up. Primary outcomes included caregiver stress, preparedness, and competence. User profiles were examined by comparing characteristics between users and non-users of the platform. User satisfaction and engagement were also assessed. Results: Of the 287 caregivers, 61% used the online platform. Compared with non-users, users showed a significant reduction in caregiving stress and greater improvements in caregiver competence, while no significant difference was found in caregiver preparedness. Users were more likely to be younger, employed full-time, have upper secondary education or above, report a monthly household income of HK$25,000 or higher, and have no chronic illness. At the 15-month follow-up, users reported high levels of satisfaction with the platform. Conclusions: The online platform effectively reduced caregiver stress and improved caregiver competence, with high user satisfaction. Further enhancements, such as increased multimedia content on practical caregiving preparation, may be needed to improve caregiver preparedness outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.