SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Melatonin in glioblastoma therapy: clinical promise and mechanistic insights from bench to bedside.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic In Vitro Effects of Minor Phytocannabinoids and Melatonin Combinations Against Human Glioblastoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain malignancy in adults, characterized by rapid progression, therapeutic resistance, and poor prognosis. Despite multimodal therapy, including maximal resection, radiotherapy, and temozolomide (TMZ), median survival is only 15 months. The recurrence rate exceeds 75%, and five-year survival is < 5%. This critical need for novel adjunctive therapies has drawn attention to melatonin, an indoleamine with multifaceted anti-tumor effects. We systematically reviewed the molecular, cellular, and therapeutic roles of melatonin in GBM to clarify its mechanistic impact and clinical potential. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies included original preclinical or clinical research on melatonin in GBM models. Risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies (QUIN) for in vitro studies, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for case reports, National Institutes of Health (NIH) for observational studies and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) for randomized clinical studies. Data were extracted on study design, melatonin formulations, molecular targets, and therapeutic outcomes. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251113393). Thirty-two studies were included: 28 preclinical, two prospective trials, one retrospective observational study, and one case report. Preclinical data consistently showed that melatonin inhibited GBM proliferation, migration, invasion, stemness, and angiogenesis; disrupted mitochondrial metabolism; induced apoptosis; and modulated key pathways (EZH2–STAT3, HIF-1α, SIRT1, MT1/MT2, miRNAs). Melatonin enhanced the efficacy of TMZ, nimotuzumab, albendazole, and HAD©C inhibitors. Preliminary clinical observations from small-scale studies hint at potential improvements in survival and reduced toxicity, though these findings require validation in larger cohorts. Preclinical models indicate that melatonin exerts pleiotropic anti-tumor effects in GBM and may synergize with standard therapies. However, clinical translation remains in early stages. Current evidence supports its promise as a co-therapeutic agent, though high-quality randomized clinical trials are urgently required to validate its efficacy, optimize dosing, and define delivery strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41604009What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.