Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41604239›Full record

ReviewStem cells translational medicine2026

Heterogeneity and optimal study design between cell lines in induced pluripotent stem cell-based cardiac disease modeling.

Renee G C Maas, Chris Denning, Joost P G Sluijter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Efficient Generation of Functional TCRαβbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Renee G C MaasUtrecht Regenerative Medicine Center, Circulatory Health Research Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584 CS, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6607-4104
Chris DenningDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0802-8617
Joost P G SluijterUtrecht Regenerative Medicine Center, Circulatory Health Research Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584 CS, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2088-9102

Funding

European Union's Horizon EuropeGEREMYHorizon2020 ERC-2016-COG-EVICARE 725229NWO-HARVEY, CURE-PlaN 18CVD01Vrienden van de Cardiologie 04520232310011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) technologies have provided access to in vitro models of inaccessible human cardiomyocytes (CMs), providing new insights into human disease mechanisms, therapy strategies, and cardiac toxicology. However, the robustness of reproducible outcomes and integration of data among research groups are hampered due to the variation between cell lines, clones, and batches-to-batch differences. These variable outcomes in hiPSC models are caused by differences in human donors, genetic stability, and experimental variability, which affect morphology, cellular heterogeneity, transcript and protein abundance, and differentiation potency. This review summarizes the usage of hiPSC-CMs obtained from multiple lines and evaluates the corresponding experimental variation between studies to perform in-depth in vitro power calculations. Our meta-analyses show that although 4 or more hiPSC lines are used in 21 published case-control studies, these reports still contain high heterogeneity between functional parameters. In specific CM readouts, the SD is >40%, meaning that the variation between different cell lines is larger than the effect of the studied mutation, drug response, or toxicity. Results indicate a need for careful selection of hiPSC lines, controls, and readout stability and these insights will further guide the power of hiPSC lines in biomedical applications.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsModels, BiologicalMyocytes, CardiacAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineHumansResearch Designcardiac in vitro modelcardiomyocytesheterogeneityhiPSCstudy design

Identifiers

PMID41604239
PMCPMC12866806

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.