ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
The seeds of the future are in the present: A blind exploration of metastable states.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The seeds of the future are in the present: A blind exploration of metastable states.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we present a type of molecular dynamics simulation that aims at finding, in a blind way, metastable states. Using only data coming from an initial unbiased simulation, and with the help of an appropriately defined loss function, we compute a bias that favors sampling yet unexplored configurational space regions, encouraging the system to leave the initial basin. In our work, we take advantage of what is normally thought to be a defect, namely the difficulty of neural networks to generalize. Contrary to most other enhanced sampling methods, which need previous knowledge of the reactive process, we are able to explore in a blind way metastable states, overcoming otherwise insuperable kinetic bottlenecks. We illustrate the workings of the method with a number of instructive examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.