Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41604295›Full record

Trial reportPsychophysiology2026

The Use of Behavioral Reconsolidation Interference in Depressive Disorders. A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Experimental Registered Report.

André Forster, Johannes Rodrigues, Billy Sperlich, Johannes Hewig

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

André ForsterDepartment of Differential Psychology, Personality Psychology, and Psychological Diagnostics, Institute of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5841-3372
Johannes RodriguesDepartment of Differential Psychology, Personality Psychology, and Psychological Diagnostics, Institute of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8471-0816
Billy SperlichDepartment of Integrative & Experimental Exercise Science & Training, Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4686-8561
Johannes HewigDepartment of Differential Psychology, Personality Psychology, and Psychological Diagnostics, Institute of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8400-189X

Funding

European Regional Development Fund 1.2-StMWKF.4-UFR-002Faculty of Human sciences, University of Würzburg ID: 04 2022/3-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depressive disorders often show recurrent courses that cannot be sufficiently prevented by existing therapeutic protocols. In other affective disorders, recurrence has been linked to three mechanisms -spontaneous recovery, accelerated new/relearning, and reinstatement- which are related to the preservation of disorder-related memory traces even through successful extinction-based interventions. Reconsolidation-interference protocols aim to directly alter such traces by reactivating and destabilizing them before intervention. While this approach has shown benefits in fear, craving, and trauma-related symptoms, its application to depression remains untested. To our knowledge, this study provides the first experimental evidence of its utility in depression-like states. Sixty participants took part in a three-day, three-group, double-blind randomized controlled trial. On day one, helplessness was induced using a modified unsolvable anagram task. On day two, participants were randomized into three groups undergoing different interventions while completing another cognitive demanding task: (1) extinction, where participants experienced success from start to finish; (2) reconsolidation, where participants briefly reexperienced failure before succeeding; or (3) reactivation, where failure repeated. On day three, the helplessness task was presented again to evaluate susceptibility for recurrence across conditions. Behavioral, self-report, and EEG data were collected. Across test days, participants showed reduced motivation and performance, attributing failure to personal ability, confirming successful helplessness induction. However, interventions at day two produced no robust group differences on behavioral, self-report, or EEG measures. Exploratory analyses suggested that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels may have mediated outcomes. Findings do not confirm reconsolidation-based behavioral interference as effective for depression-like helplessness. Nonetheless, exploratory results highlight BDNF as a potential mediator, warranting further study on its role in postretrieval extinction effects in depression.

Indexed as

Depressive DisorderExtinction, PsychologicalHelplessness, LearnedMemory ConsolidationAdultBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePre-Registration PublicationYoung AdultBDNF protein, humanBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

Identifiers

PMID41604295
PMCPMC12851423

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.