ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
CLinNET: An Interpretable and Uncertainty-Aware Deep Learning Framework for Multi-Modal Clinical Genomics.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Global Genomic Resources: A Narrative Review of Implications for Precision Medicine.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Sustained hypoxia induces divergent response patterns in cardiac metabolic-immune adaptation and circadian rhythm regulation.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying molecular drivers and diagnostic genes for neurocognitive disorders (NDs) remains a major challenge due to the prevalence of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and limitations in current diagnostic platforms. While artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential solutions, existing models often lack interpretability and fail to address uncertainty, limiting clinical utility. CLinNET, a multi-modal deep neural network with a dual-branch design integrating sequencing data, gene expression, biological pathways, and gene ontology (GO) is introduced to enhance gene curation and VUS interpretation. CLinNET employs a biologically informed architecture, confidence-based uncertainty quantification, and layer-wise SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for robust interpretability. Its sparse networks, enriched with pathway and GO data, prioritize tissue-expressed genes to improve prediction accuracy and biological relevance. Trained on ND datasets, CLinNET outperformed existing methods with an F1-score of 76.4%, accuracy of 77.2%, and area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR) of 84%. Incorporating uncertainty filtering further improved precision to 87% while retaining 73% of predictions as high-confidence. CLinNET identified significantly more ND-associated genes than random permutations, with minimal overlap with cardiovascular-associated genes, confirming specificity. Among the top decile of ranked genes, 78 were linked to NDs (p-value = 1.2e-11), and 372 to rare diseases involving nervous system abnormalities, highlighting their diagnostic potential. CLinNET's validation in prostate cancer datasets underscores its adaptability, positioning it as a robust tool for individualized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.