ArticleScientific reports2026
A multimodal retinal aging clock for biological age prediction and systemic health assessment via OCT and fundus imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herein we developed age clocks that predict biological age from fundus photography and optical coherence tomography. We evaluated our multimodal models' clinical relevance by examining their associations between predicted biological age and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Study 1 assessed how models trained on normal eyes generalize to diseased eyes, and Study 2 tested whether incorporating disease labels improves performance and systemic associations. Models were fine-tuned to the imaging dataset to predict biological age. Linear regressors were trained on chronological and biological features to infer CCI. Gradient-weighted regression activation mapping also generated heatmaps to identify the model's region of focus. Prediction performance improved when trained on both normal and diseased eyes. Predicted biological age showed significantly stronger correlations with CCI than chronological age across both studies, supporting our algorithm's association with this validated measure of mortality. Thus, our algorithm may provide insight into systemic health burdens beyond that of traditional risk assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.