Observational studyScientific reports2026
Lipid metabolism and gallstone disease risk: a multicenter study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Central adiposity and sex influence lipid and glucose indices in Mexican adults: implications for metabolic risk assessment.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the associations between various lipid parameters and the risk of gallstone disease (GSD). A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted to explore the associations between nine lipid parameters and the risk of GSD. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for covariates, were employed to evaluate these associations. Stratified analyses by age and sex were performed to assess population-specific effects. Data from multiple centers were integrated using meta-analysis to generate pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was implemented to determine the sufficiency of the sample size and the robustness of the associations under cumulative evidence conditions. This multicenter study included 580,935 participants, with a GSD prevalence of 7.43%. After adjusting for covariables, the combined multi-center results showed that total cholesterol, high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-HDL cholesterol were negatively associated with GSD risk. In contrast, the Castelli risk index I and II, atherogenic coefficient, and atherogenic index of plasma were positively associated with the risk of GSD. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Stratified analysis revealed distinct lipid-gallstone associations between people with cholecystectomy and gallbladder stones. TSA revealed that the required amount of information has been achieved, and the results are conclusive. This study suggests significant associations between lipid metabolism and the risk of GSD. There are differences in the relationship between blood lipid indexes and cholecystectomy and gallstones. These findings not only enhance our understanding of the relationship between lipid metabolism and GSD but also provide a novel perspective for risk assessment and prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.