Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41606253›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Breast cancer survivors' perspectives on a clinical decision tool to support individualized exercise prescriptions and discussions.

Oliver W A Wilson, Kaitlyn M Wojcik, Eleanor M Kerr, Ilse Rivera, Emma Tian, Jacob D Schneider, Rachelle Brick, David Berrigan, Kosuke Tamura, Laura Q Rogers and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Oliver W A WilsonDecision Sciences Research Laboratory, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kaitlyn M WojcikDecision Sciences Research Laboratory, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Eleanor M KerrRipple Effect Communications, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9390-4655
Ilse RiveraRipple Effect Communications, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA.
Emma TianDecision Sciences Research Laboratory, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6594-4780
Jacob D SchneiderDecision Sciences Research Laboratory, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6707-8674
Rachelle BrickHealth Systems and Interventions Research Branch of the Healthcare Delivery Research Program in the Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences at the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health,, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7099-7799
David BerriganDivision of Cancer Control &, Population Sciences at the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8037-3103
Kosuke TamuraDecision Sciences Research Laboratory, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-2856
Laura Q RogersDivision of General Internal Medicine and Population Science, Department of Medicine at University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4216-8381
Wendy Demark-WahnefriedDepartment of Nutrition Sciences at, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5241-932X
Richard L StreetDepartment of Communication and Journalism at, Texas AandM University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-9927
Jinani JayasekeraDecision Sciences Research Laboratory, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. jinani.jayasekera@nih.gov.

Funding

Socio-Spatial Determinants of Health (SSDH) ZIAMD000020 · NIMHD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES · PI TAMURA, KOSUKE · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
Health Equity and Decision SciencesZIAMD000022 · NIMHD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES · PI JAYASEKERA, JINANI · 2023 to 2025
$962k
William G. Coleman AwardZIJMD000009 · NIMHD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES · PI CHOI, KELVIN · 2017 to 2025
$732k
Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) ZIA MD000022, PI: JayasekeraDivision of Intramural Research at the NIMHD of the NIH ZIA MD000020, PI: TamuraIntramural NIH HHS ZIA MD000020Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MD000022Intramural NIH HHS ZIJ MD000009National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1 ZIJ MD000009-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine breast cancer survivors' perspectives on the prototype (paper-draft) of a clinical decision tool to support individualized exercise prescriptions and discussions within clinical settings.

methodsA sample of ≥90 female breast cancer survivors aged ≥35 years across the U.S. were recruited to complete an online survey that collected data on survivors' characteristics and perspectives of a prototype of the tool. Survey items were adapted from validated pre-existing instruments and refined via cognitive interviews.

resultsNinety-eight of the 142 individuals screened were deemed eligible and completed the survey. Most breast cancer survivors agreed that a tool would be useful (84.7%) and increase confidence to discuss exercise with a healthcare provider (74.5%). Among tool uses, the highest agreement was found for education (84.1%) and encouragement to exercise (79.3%). Improving the ability to do everyday tasks (74.0%), quality-of-life (72.6%), and energy (71.4%) were rated as the top exercise benefits to include in a tool. Agreement on tool usefulness, uses, and inputs varied by survivors' demographic, clinical, and contextual characteristics. For example, agreement that a tool would increase their confidence to discuss exercise was lower among younger survivors (<50 years, 67.7%) than older survivors (≥50 years, 78.5%).

conclusionsAn evidence-based clinical decision tool offering individualized exercise information could support exercise prescriptions and discussions within clinical settings. However, a one-size-fits-all tool may not address existing disparities in exercise participation. Further research among underserved women is needed.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDecision Support TechniquesExerciseExercise TherapySurvivorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancer patientsClinical decision support systemsExercise DiscussionExercise prescriptionExercise referralPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID41606253
PMCPMC12852301

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.