ArticleBMC public health2026
Religion and public health: conceptualization and collaboration from a public health perspective.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReligion and public health, when understood in their broadest sense, are systems of knowledge and practice that seek to improve the wellbeing of people and populations. With over 75.8% of the global population identifying with some form of religious belief, understanding how the public health community conceptualizes religion and engages with it is essential for meaningful collaboration. The purpose of this study is to explore the conceptualizations of and relationships between religion and public health, focusing on public health practitioners’ experiences in engaging with religious communities.
methodsThis qualitative study involved interviews with 15 North American public health practitioners across diverse religious and ethnic backgrounds, examining their perspectives on religion’s role in health interventions, with a particular focus on the COVID-19 pandemic.
resultsUsing a framework analysis, three key thematic areas emerged, including: (1) Conceptualizations of religion and how it contributes to individual and collective wellbeing; (2) Current relationship between public health and religion; and (3) Opportunities for and strategies to establish deeper collaboration. The results reveal a strong perception among public health professionals that religious communities are being engaged in an instrumental and transactional manner to achieve public health’s agenda, rather than as true partners that co-design health interventions. While some religious communities are compliant with such interactions, many are reluctant in engaging with public health communities. To move away from instrumental and transactional interactions to meaningful engagement, interviewees share numerous strategies consistent with the principles of community-engaged research (e.g., engaging with religious communities with sincerity, humility, transparency, and valuing the knowledge these communities possess). DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that the prerequisites for effective engagement between public health and religious communities is based on foundational principles such as trust, transparency, and the need to identify points of commonality in order to organically work towards improving the health and wellbeing of communities. Putting these principles into practice raises questions about concepts such as expertise, access to knowledge, problem identification, and prioritization. In addition, it challenges the current structures and financing mechanisms for public health practice. Integration of religion into public health education could serve as a foundation to foster more inclusive and integrative public health practice. While more research must be conducted with broader samples, insights from this study underscore the potential for more inclusive public health approaches that better address the diverse spiritual and cultural landscapes of global populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.