SynthesisAnnals of medicine2026
Prevalence and incidence of post-intensive care syndrome among intensive care unit survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-intensive care syndrome (PICS) is a post-discharge complication from the intensive care unit (ICU) that manifests as a range of physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments for patients. Given the growing number of ICU survivors and the vital role of this syndrome in identifying individuals at risk of deterioration after ICU discharge, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence and incidence of PICS.
methodBetween January 1, 2010, and October 5, 2024, a thorough search was conducted across the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. Cross-sectional and cohort studies were included. The prevalence and incidence of PICS, as determined by any assessment method, were the primary study outcomes. PICS was defined according to the criteria used in each primary study. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Meta-regression analysis was employed to investigate the impact of distinct follow-up durations on the reported prevalence and incidence. The JBI critical appraisal tool for prevalence studies was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.
resultsThis systematic review and meta-analysis synthesised data from 34 studies involving 6230 participants. The pooled prevalence and incidence of PICS were 60.3% (95% CI: 48.5-72.1) and 52.4% (95% CI: 47.6-57.2), respectively. The I
conclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate a notable prevalence and incidence of PICS among ICU survivors. These findings highlight the need for early detection of at-risk individuals and the development of evidence-based approaches to monitor and address impairments related to PICS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.