ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
AI-Assisted surgical vision: evaluating YOLOv8 and YOLOv12 for real-time detection in colon cancer surgery.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Design-Driven Innovation Path of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Healthcare: Theory, Practice, and Future Prospects.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Automated FDG uptake/PET-CT fused scan diagnosis of various lymph node tumors using object detection AI techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Using contrast-enhancing software to improve sentinel lymph node detection with indocyanine green in colon cancer surgery.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Current intraoperative navigation systems have shown significant effectiveness for organs with fixed shapes, but they struggle to adapt to the challenges of tissue deformation and displacement in gastrointestinal surgeries. This study evaluates the established YOLOv8 and the emerging YOLOv12 with enhanced feature extraction capabilities, aiming to identify an optimal real-time model for dynamic surgical scenarios to improve procedural efficiency and safety. Methods: In this multi-center retrospective study, object detection and instance segmentation was achieved by training YOLOv8 and YOLOv12 models on 1,847 images extracted from 22 surgical videos collected across four hospitals nationwide. The models were subsequently validated and tested and performance was rigorously compared using standard metrics, such as precision, recall, mAP@0.5, mAP@0.5-0.95, and the size of the weight file. Furthermore, the clinical applicability of the top-performing models was evaluated via a questionnaire survey. Results: Both YOLOv8 and YOLOv12 demonstrated competent performance in object detection and instance segmentation tasks. For the test set, YOLOv12 achieved significantly higher recall rates than YOLOv8 in both object detection and instance segmentation ( Conclusion: In scenarios with limited hardware resources, the object detection task using the YOLOv12 model is strongly recommended to assist in robotic colon cancer surgery, enhancing surgical efficiency and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.