Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41607813›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of transplantation2026

Application of machine learning in the research progress of post-kidney transplant rejection.

Yun-Peng Guo, Quan Wen, Yu-Yang Wang, Gai Hang, Bo Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yun-Peng GuoTongliao Clinical Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Tongliao 028000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Quan WenDepartment of Urinary Surgery, Tongliao People's Hospital, Tongliao 028000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Yu-Yang WangThe Graduate School, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhehot 010000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Gai HangDepartment of Urinary Surgery, Tongliao City Hospital, Tongliao 028000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Bo ChenDepartment of Urinary Surgery, Tongliao People's Hospital, Tongliao 028000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. chenmuxin@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-kidney transplant rejection is a critical factor influencing transplant success rates and the survival of transplanted organs. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence technologies, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful data analysis tool, widely applied in the prediction, diagnosis, and mechanistic study of kidney transplant rejection. This mini-review systematically summarizes the recent applications of ML techniques in post-kidney transplant rejection, covering areas such as the construction of predictive models, identification of biomarkers, analysis of pathological images, assessment of immune cell infiltration, and formulation of personalized treatment strategies. By integrating multi-omics data and clinical information, ML has significantly enhanced the accuracy of early rejection diagnosis and the capability for prognostic evaluation, driving the development of precision medicine in the field of kidney transplantation. Furthermore, this article discusses the challenges faced in existing research and potential future directions, providing a theoretical basis and technical references for related studies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersImmune cell infiltrationKidney transplantMachine learningPathological image analysisPrecision medicinePredictive modelsRejection

Identifiers

PMID41607813
PMCPMC12836255

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.