ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Development of biobanking infrastructure in Armenia: opportunities and challenges.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biobanking has become a cornerstone of biomedical research and precision medicine, enabling population studies, biomarker discovery, and translational research. However, while high-income countries operate mature biobanking systems, middle-income and transitional economies encounter distinct barriers to establishing sustainable and internationally compatible infrastructures. This mini review examines the development of biobanking in Armenia as a representative middle-income case. It highlights key opportunities, such as strong diaspora scientific networks, a growing biotechnology sector, increasing national interest in precision medicine, and Armenia's strategic geographic position between Europe and Asia. At the same time, significant challenges persist, including limited funding, regulatory and ethical gaps, infrastructure constraints, shortages in specialized technical personnel, and socio-cultural barriers related to sample donation and data sharing. The review outlines strategic approaches adopted in Armenia, including international collaboration, capacity-building initiatives, and alignment with global best practices. Lessons from Armenia's experience may guide other middle-income and post-Soviet countries in developing effective and resilient biobanking systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.