ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Cost of illness analysis in individuals with overweight or obesity and chronic low back pain in the Bern metropolitan area (the BO2WL trial).
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05811624 (Lifestyle Intervention in Overweight/Obese People Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Lifestyle Intervention in Overweight/Obese People Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain: an International Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evolving Landscape of Regenerative Therapies: Cell-Based and Cell-Free Approaches for Chronic Low Back Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) imposes substantial societal costs, with comorbid overweight or obesity possibly further increasing them. This study assessed the cost of illness of individuals with CLBP and comorbid overweight or obesity in the Bern metropolitan area (Switzerland) from a societal perspective. Methods: Following the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 and using preliminary baseline data from a randomised controlled trial, societal costs, including direct and indirect costs, over 3 months were calculated for adults with overweight or obesity and CLBP. Self-reported data were monetised using a bottom-up, prevalence-based approach, and absenteeism and presenteeism were valued via the human capital approach. Mean costs with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported in 2025 Swiss Francs (CHF) per cost category. Results: Fifty-three individuals (19 male, 34 female) with a mean age of 47.8 years (SD: 10.1) were included, comprising 18 individuals with overweight and 35 with obesity. Mean direct medical costs were CHF 543.69 (95% CI = [382.80; 686.33]), and mean direct non-medical costs were CHF 19.39 (95% CI = [0.00; 38.63]) respectively. Indirect costs accounted for 80% of total societal costs, with costs attributable to absenteeism of CHF 1,000.39 (95% CI = [2.63; 1,681.40]), presenteeism costs of CHF 549.47 (95% CI = [281.67; 774.67]) and costs due to impaired unpaid work of CHF 745.56 (95% CI = [241.02; 1,436.80]). Total societal costs averaged CHF 2,850.44 (95% CI = [1,667.17; 3,829.17]). Conclusion: Despite the exclusion of individuals with uncontrolled, untreated comorbidities and those receiving invalidity payments, this study demonstrates a substantial financial burden of individuals with overweight or obesity and CLBP. From societal perspective, this burden is primarily driven by productivity losses. These findings emphasise the need for targeted cost-effective clinical interventions, coordinated policy initiatives, and further research to mitigate the significant societal impact of this population. Trial registration number: NCT05811624 (Clinicaltrials.gov). Acronym: BO2WL trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.