ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2026
Postmarketing Surveillance of the Safety and Effectiveness of Metreleptin in Patients with Lipodystrophy in Japan.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of metreleptin treatment in congenital generalized lipodystrophy: a retrospective analysis from the MENA region.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Postmarketing Surveillance of the Safety and Effectiveness of Metreleptin in Patients with Lipodystrophy in Japan.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The long-term safety and effectiveness of metreleptin in patients with lipodystrophy were evaluated. Methods: We conducted postmarketing surveillance of all patients administered metreleptin at least once from July 2013 at its launch through July 2021 in Japan. Data were collected through July 2022. The safety analysis set included all patients with Case Report Forms (CRFs) retrieved, including those who transitioned from premarketing clinical trials and those who newly initiated metreleptin after its launch. Only the latter cases were eligible for the effectiveness analysis set. Effectiveness was evaluated by changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and triglyceride levels. Results: CRFs were collected from 48 patients. Thirty-six were new cases, and 12 were transitioned cases. Twenty-six types of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 15 patients. The most reported ADRs were "decreased appetite" and "neutralizing antibodies positive," reported in 3 patients each. However, there were no safety concerns overall. Mean levels of HbA1c and triglycerides decreased at 2 or 4 months of treatment. Values thereafter remained stable for up to 7 years for HbA1c and triglycerides. Mean levels of HbA1c and triglycerides improved after 1, 2, and 3 years, although the change was not as great in partial lipodystrophy patients as in generalized lipodystrophy patients. Conclusion: Metreleptin treatment was generally well tolerated in patients with generalized and partial lipodystrophy and lowered HbA1c and triglycerides in those with generalized lipodystrophy. This surveillance demonstrated for the first time the long-term safety in the real world and the effectiveness in patients who used the medication correctly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.