ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures.
Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between CYP2C19 Genotype and P2Y12 Reaction Units in Patients Receiving Clopidogrel After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective, Observational Study.Pharmacotherapy · 2026Observational
- Flow Diversion for Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- The impact of concomitant use of rosuvastatin or atorvastatin plus clopidogrel on the platelet inhibition and clinical outcomes in acute large-vessel minor stroke or TIA: A randomized controlled multi-center trial, the ROCATIS-1 trial.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Kazakh ThromboTest for intraoperative thrombosis risk assessment during stent-assisted cerebral aneurysm treatment: a single-center clinical study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of antiplatelet medications in neurointerventional procedures remains a subject of considerable variability and debate. This review article explores the diverse clinical practices and the impact of different antiplatelet regimens and platelet activity testing on patient outcomes in neurointerventional treatments. While much of the evidence around antiplatelet therapies largely stems from randomized trials in cardiac and peripheral vascular diseases, their application in neurointerventional settings requires nuanced consideration. Various assays exist to assess individual platelet function, yet the optimal assay, thresholds, and agents remain uncertain due to interpatient variability in medication responsiveness. Expert consensus groups have attempted to standardize antiplatelet management, which is summarized for elective and emergent neurointerventional procedures. Clopidogrel, a commonly used antiplatelet, faces challenges such as genetic variability in metabolism and drug-drug interactions, impacting its effectiveness. Other agents, such as ticagrelor and prasugrel, offer alternatives with different mechanisms of action and potential advantages. Additionally, short-acting intravenous P2Y
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.