SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for primary risk stratification in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Analysis of the association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and liver injury complicating acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early risk stratification in acute pancreatitis should address not only the probability of severe disease but also the timely prediction of persistent organ failure, (POF) infectious complications [including infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN)], and mortality. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a low-cost, first-line biomarker that is readily obtainable within the initial 24-48 h. Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of the NLR for predicting a severe disease course, persistent organ failure, infection, and mortality across predefined, time-specific measurement windows. Methods: We conducted a systematic review with meta-analytic synthesis of studies assessing the NLR at admission and during the first two days of hospitalization. Random-effects models were used, and bivariate approaches were applied to synthesize diagnostic accuracy. Results: Elevated admission NLR was consistently associated with subsequent severe disease and an early need for intensive care. NLR dynamics on day 1 and day 2 preserved prognostic value and improved identification of patients at risk of persistent organ failure. NLR also helped identify individuals more likely to develop infectious complications, including infected pancreatic necrosis. An admission NLR > 12 was associated with in-hospital mortality. Overall, NLR showed acceptable discriminative performance with a favorable sensitivity-specificity profile and remained clinically useful for early triage. Conclusions: The NLR is a simple, reproducible tool for early prediction of organ failure, infection, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. The use of time-specific, locally calibrated thresholds, integrated with clinical scores and routine laboratory data, is recommended to optimize patient triage, routing, and care decisions. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (CRD420251169592).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.