ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2026
Mapping awareness and application of orthobiologics among orthopaedic professionals: A cross-sectional study.
Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthobiologics-biological substances like platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentrate, and stem cells-are increasingly used in musculoskeletal care to promote tissue repair and reduce reliance on invasive surgery. Despite global momentum, India's clinical adoption remains underexplored.
aimTo inform education, policy, and resource allocation for the safe and effective adoption of orthobiologics in musculoskeletal care.
methodsA cross-sectional electronic survey was conducted from January to March 2025 among orthopaedic surgeons, academicians, and trainees across India. The questionnaire assessed demographics, knowledge of orthobiologics, attitudes toward training and subspecialization, usage trends, regulatory awareness, and perceived barriers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and
resultsA total of 1280 valid responses were collected. Awareness of orthobiologics was high (97%), with PRP being the most familiar and widely used (80%). Formal training was reported by only 31%, though 85% showed interest in structured education, and 68% supported orthobiologics as a subspecialty. Satisfaction with clinical outcomes averaged 6.5 ± 2.3 out of 10 points. Barriers included high treatment cost (64%), poor patient awareness (90%), and limited access to biologics labs (18%). Regulatory understanding was moderate, with academic-affiliated clinicians more informed about stem cell guidelines.
conclusionIndian orthopaedic professionals demonstrate strong awareness and optimism toward orthobiologics, but widespread gaps in training, infrastructure, and regulation hinder broader adoption. Strategic investments in education, standardized protocols, and accessible facilities are essential to support safe and evidence-driven integration of regenerative therapies into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.