ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
The cervico-vaginal DNA methylation WID-qEC test: An epigenetic marker associated with ovarian cancer in the absence of endometrial and cervical cancer.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The DNA methylation-based WID-qEC test, applied to cervico-vaginal samples, has been validated for the accurate detection of endometrial and cervical cancers. However, a small proportion of women test positive despite the absence of these cancers. The aim of this study was to explore the biological and clinical characteristics associated with such WID-qEC-positive cases to inform potential follow-up strategies. We analyzed 1269 cervico-vaginal samples from women without endometrial or cervical cancer, including healthy controls (n = 624), women with benign gynecological conditions (n = 324), and ovarian cancer cases (n = 321). Of the 80 WID-qEC-positive results, 43 (54%) were from women with ovarian cancer. WID-qEC positivity was associated with the presence of ovarian cancer (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.93; 95% CI 1.75-4.95) and with a higher number of lifetime ovulatory cycles (adjusted OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.06-7.50), a known ovarian cancer risk factor. Both associations were independent of age, menopausal status, hormone replacement therapy usage, or family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Our findings suggest that in the absence of endometrial or cervical cancer, WID-qEC positivity may indicate an elevated risk or presence of ovarian cancer. While the standalone positive predictive value (PPV) for ovarian cancer detection remains low in the general population, we outline how WID-qEC could be used in a two-step triage approach. In women presenting with abnormal bleeding, combining WID-qEC positivity with a highly specific plasma-based cell-free DNA methylation test (e.g., with 60%-80% sensitivity and ~98.4% specificity) could theoretically yield a PPV of around 30%-40%. This hypothetical modeling is intended solely to illustrate how WID-qEC positivity might inform future triage research, rather than to propose a clinical diagnostic algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.