ArticleThe FEBS journal2026
Metabolic pathways fuelling devil facial tumour diseases.
Article in The FEBS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Devil Facial Tumour Diseases (DFTD), threatening Tasmanian devils, consist of two distinct transmissible cancers, DFT1 and DFT2, with differing origins and geographic spread. We investigated the metabolic differences between DFT1 and DFT2, examining cell viability, metabolic outputs, and bulk gene expression. Using both DFT1 and DFT2 cell lines and biopsies, we found that glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, glutamate metabolism, and fatty acid synthesis are all essential for the survival of both tumour types. However, DFT2 exhibited higher rates of glycolysis and lactate generation compared to DFT1. This coincided with elevated ATP production, cholesterol biosynthesis, and ROS generation, as well as an increased reliance on fatty acid metabolism. Furthermore, DFT2 is less metabolically adaptable than DFT1, being unable to switch to oxidative phosphorylation as DFT1 can when required. These metabolic changes in DFT2, in conjunction with its higher growth rate, suggest a more aggressive cancer phenotype than DFT1. Our findings highlight distinct metabolic adaptations in DFT2 that may contribute to its competitive advantage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.