Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41610185›Full record

ReviewScience progress

Intelligent technology-driven diabetes prevention and control: From informatization management to artificial intelligence.

Geer Deng, Wang Chengshi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Geer DengFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-4100-1080
Wang ChengshiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Laboratory of Diabetes and Metabolism Research, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The escalating prevalence of diabetes, along with its complications and mortality risks, imposes a substantial disease burden worldwide. The current suboptimal medical conditions and poor self-management among diabetic patients have exacerbated the deterioration of diabetes globally, particularly in economically underdeveloped countries. However, this situation may now be approaching a turning point. With the constantly advancement of intelligent technologies, the widespread adoption of information management systems and the rise of artificial intelligence have made it possible to enhance the efficiency of diabetes treatment and reduce management costs. Therefore, we have reviewed the relevant literature and conducted a narrative review following the guidance of the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA). The present paper provides a narrative review of research advances from information management to artificial intelligence in the field of diabetes treatment and management, while also discussing the opportunities and challenges in clinical translation and application. The present review offers a conceptual framework to inform future research and development in intelligent diabetes care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiabetes MellitusDigital HealthHumansIntelligent Systemsartificial intelligenceDiabetesdiagnosisinformatization managementprecision prevention

Identifiers

PMID41610185
PMCPMC12855743

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.