Evidence mapPaperPMID 41611606Full record

ReviewExpert review of clinical pharmacology

Pharmacological interventions for alcohol use disorder: novel insights from recent clinical trials.

Kaitlin R McManus, Lara A Ray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaitlin R McManusDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lara A RayDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Clinical Neuroscience of Alcoholism: Integrating Neuroscience and Clinical TrialsK24AA025704 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · 2025 to 2025
$213k
NIAAA NIH HHS K24 AA025704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction27.1 million adults in the United States have alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, current medications for AUD have mixed efficacy. As such, a shift in treatment approach and the development of novel pharmacotherapies for AUD is imperative. AREAS COVERED: This review addresses novel insights on treating AUD through precision medicine that identifies subgroups of individuals most responsive to existing single or combination pharmacotherapies for AUD. In parallel, this review synthesizes the emergence of pharmacological agents for AUD that are on the treatment horizon. These include glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, classic psychedelics, ketamine, immune modulators, and cannabinoids. Data reviewed were culled from searches of the PubMed database and clinicaltrials.gov registry. EXPERT OPINION: Adopting a precision medicine approach and investigating novel compounds for AUD treatment requires a shift in systems of care. Precision medicine navigates away from the traditional 'one size fits all' health care model to emphasize the individual, leading to long-term cost-effectiveness and improved patient outcomes. Moreover, novel pharmacotherapies face challenges in the scale of their distribution throughout healthcare settings. The developments reviewed in this paper elucidate a paradigm shift necessary to facilitate the integration of precision medicine and the adoption of novel pharmacotherapies within the AUD field.

Indexed as

AlcoholismDrug DevelopmentPrecision MedicineAnimalsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansAlcohol use disorderclassic psychedelicsglucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonistsimmune modulatorspharmacotherapyprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID41611606
PMCPMC13132032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.