Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41611837›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Modeling and experimental verification of polycaprolactone nanoparticle precipitation.

Ewa Rybak, Jakub Trzciński, Jakub Gac, Tomasz Ciach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Synthesis,ACS omega · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ewa RybakFaculty of Chemical and Process Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Waryńskiego 1, Warsaw, 00-645, Poland. ewa.rybak@pw.edu.pl.
Jakub TrzcińskiCentre for Advanced Materials and Technologies CEZAMAT, Warsaw University of Technology, Poleczki 19, Warsaw, 02-822, Poland. jakub.trzcinski@pw.edu.pl.
Jakub GacFaculty of Chemical and Process Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Waryńskiego 1, Warsaw, 00-645, Poland.
Tomasz CiachFaculty of Chemical and Process Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Waryńskiego 1, Warsaw, 00-645, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A numerical model based on the diffusion equation was developed to predict the size of polycaprolactone (PCL) nanoparticles produced via nanoprecipitation. The model requires minimal input data, making it cost-effective and experimentally efficient. It accounts for both diffusion-driven growth and the finite coalescence time of particles, a factor often overlooked in nanoparticle formation. Nanoparticles were synthesized under controlled variation of polymer concentration, surfactant amount, and mixing method, including microfluidics. The model demonstrated strong agreement with experimental data, yielding higher predictive accuracy than prior diffusion-limited models. It also enabled optimization of process parameters, improving control over size distribution and reducing aggregation. The proposed framework enhances nanoprecipitation scalability and reproducibility while lowering resource consumption. Its modular structure allows adaptation to other polymers and formulation conditions. This approach offers a practical and computationally efficient tool for the rational design of polymeric nanoparticles, with broad relevance to biomedical applications, including targeted drug delivery and nanomedicine.

Indexed as

NanoprecipitationNumerical modelingPolycaprolactonePolymeric nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID41611837
PMCPMC12913609

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.