Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41611902›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2026

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for motor function preservation during AVMs resection: Indication or redundancy? Beyond the doctrine of "all-or-nothing".

Carmelo Lucio Sturiale, Fulvio Grilli, Gianluca Trevisi, Matteo Palermo, Michele Di Domenico, Marco Galeazzi, Rina di Bonaventura, Alessandro Olivi, Alessio Albanese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carmelo Lucio SturialeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. cropcircle.2000@virgilio.it.
Fulvio GrilliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Gianluca TrevisiDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti-Pescara, Italy. Neurosurgical Unit, Ospedale Civile Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy.
Matteo PalermoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Michele Di DomenicoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Marco GaleazziDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Rina di BonaventuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro OliviDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Alessio AlbaneseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) involving eloquent motor regions remains one of the most challenging tasks in neurosurgery due to the risk of irreversible motor deficits. Historically, such lesions have often been managed conservatively or with radiosurgery, particularly when located near primary motor cortex or corticospinal tracts. However, the advent of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) allows for real-time feedback on motor pathway function, potentially enabling safer resections in areas previously considered inoperable. This study investigates the effectiveness of IONM in reducing motor morbidity during AVM surgery. We prospectively enrolled 48 patients who underwent AVM resection between 2018 and 2025 at a single center. All surgeries incorporated a standardized IONM protocol, including continuous somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and dynamic cortical and subcortical mapping. Patients were stratified into high and low motor-risk groups based on AVM topography. Clinical, imaging, and angioarchitectural data were analyzed. Primary outcomes were new postoperative motor deficits; secondary outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and residual nidus presence. Statistical analysis included univariate and multivariate regression. Of the 48 patients (mean age 45.2), 42% presented with hemorrhage and 50% had left-hemisphere AVMs. Spetzler-Martin grades ranged from I to IV. Three patients (6.25%) had residual AVM postoperatively, two of which were intentional due to IONM alerts. None developed new deficits. One residual spontaneously thrombosed during follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed preoperative mRS, not motor eloquence, was the main predictor of outcome in ruptured AVMs. No significant difference in postoperative motor function or mRS was found between high- and low-risk groups. IONM enables safe, function-preserving AVM resection in motor eloquent areas. It supports intraoperative decision-making, reducing morbidity and expanding surgical indications guiding a “maximal safe resection” strategy focused on functional preservation rather than angiographic radicality alone.

Indexed as

Intracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringNeurosurgical ProceduresAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArteriovenous malformationEloquentIONMMappingMEPNeuromonitoringSSEP

Identifiers

PMID41611902
PMCPMC12855350

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.