ReviewDiscover oncology2026
Circulating tumor DNA dynamics predict pathological response and guide therapy personalization in the neoadjuvant setting.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Mitochondrial fitness in circulating T cells predicts neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced colorectal cancer.Gastroenterology report · 2026Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Breast Cancer: A Liquid Biopsy Revolution for Non-Invasive Genomic Profiling and Clinical Decision-Making.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Peripheral blood biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: distinguishing predictive from prognostic biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- ctDNA-based detection of residual disease: implications for management of non-metastatic NSCLC.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Integration of Nanotechnology with ctDNA: New Advances for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Immunometabolic Reprogramming in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Implications.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy is a cornerstone of modern oncology, yet its efficacy is traditionally assessed only after treatment completion, creating a "black box" period where patients may receive ineffective, toxic therapies. This review explores the transformative potential of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a dynamic biomarker to overcome this limitation. The short half-life of ctDNA allows for real-time, non-invasive monitoring of tumor burden through serial liquid biopsies. A substantial body of evidence across breast, lung, colorectal, and other solid tumors demonstrates that on-treatment ctDNA dynamics are a powerful predictor of pathological response and long-term survival. Rapid ctDNA clearance is strongly associated with favorable outcomes, providing a rationale for treatment de-escalation, while persistent ctDNA identifies non-responders who may benefit from therapy intensification. Despite its promise, the clinical adoption of ctDNA is hindered by challenges including a lack of assay standardization, the existence of low-shedding tumors, and biological confounders like clonal hematopoiesis. The future of precision neoadjuvant care lies in integrating ctDNA with imaging and other biological data within a multimodal framework, leveraging artificial intelligence to guide personalized, response-adapted treatment strategies. This paradigm shift from static to dynamic assessment promises to unlock the full potential of neoadjuvant therapy, maximizing efficacy while minimizing toxicity for individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.