Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41611911›Full record

ReviewDiscover oncology2026

Circulating tumor DNA dynamics predict pathological response and guide therapy personalization in the neoadjuvant setting.

Hani Moslem Ahmed, Ali Fawzi Al-Hussainy, Wael Waleed Mustafa, S Renuka Jyothi, Priya Priyadarshini Nayak, J Bethanney Janney, Gurjant Singh, Aashna Sinha, Hayder Naji Sameer, Rasim M Salih and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hani Moslem AhmedCollege of Pharmacy, Alnoor University, Nineveh, Iraq.
Ali Fawzi Al-HussainyCollege of Pharmacy, Ahl Al Bayt University, Karbala, Iraq.
Wael Waleed MustafaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Turath University College, Baghdad, Iraq.
S Renuka JyothiDepartment of Biotechnology and Genetics, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Priya Priyadarshini NayakDepartment of Medical Oncology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.
J Bethanney JanneyDepartment of Biomedical, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Gurjant SinghDepartment of Physiotherapy, University Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Chandigarh University, Chandigarh State, Punjab, India.
Aashna SinhaSchool of Applied and Life Sciences, Division of Research and Innovation, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Hayder Naji SameerCollage of Pharmacy, National University of Science and Technology, Dhi Qar, 64001, Iraq.
Rasim M SalihAl-Zahrawi University College, Karbala, Iraq.
Mohaned AdilPharmacy College, Al-Farahidi University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Pouria SalajeghehNeuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. salajegheh.poorya@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy is a cornerstone of modern oncology, yet its efficacy is traditionally assessed only after treatment completion, creating a "black box" period where patients may receive ineffective, toxic therapies. This review explores the transformative potential of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a dynamic biomarker to overcome this limitation. The short half-life of ctDNA allows for real-time, non-invasive monitoring of tumor burden through serial liquid biopsies. A substantial body of evidence across breast, lung, colorectal, and other solid tumors demonstrates that on-treatment ctDNA dynamics are a powerful predictor of pathological response and long-term survival. Rapid ctDNA clearance is strongly associated with favorable outcomes, providing a rationale for treatment de-escalation, while persistent ctDNA identifies non-responders who may benefit from therapy intensification. Despite its promise, the clinical adoption of ctDNA is hindered by challenges including a lack of assay standardization, the existence of low-shedding tumors, and biological confounders like clonal hematopoiesis. The future of precision neoadjuvant care lies in integrating ctDNA with imaging and other biological data within a multimodal framework, leveraging artificial intelligence to guide personalized, response-adapted treatment strategies. This paradigm shift from static to dynamic assessment promises to unlock the full potential of neoadjuvant therapy, maximizing efficacy while minimizing toxicity for individual patients.

Indexed as

CtDNALiquid biopsyNeoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID41611911
PMCPMC12936245

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.