ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Multi-omics deep learning improves FDG PET-CT-based long-term prognostication of breast cancer.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How AI Can Advance Mathematical Biology: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Review
- Automatic metabolic breast cancer staging using [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT: comparison with nuclear medicine physician-based and clinical staging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography - computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) is increasingly used for staging of breast cancer in the primary and recurrent setting, as well as in evaluating treatment response and in follow-up. Quantitative parameters derived from the primary tumor, even in non-metastatic patients (i.e., without distant metastases but possibly with nodal involvement), have shown prognostic value. Beyond visual interpretation, quantitative evaluations may improve diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility. However, current studies often rely on predefined parameters such as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), which may overlook the high-dimensional patterns inherent in FDG PET-CT. To address this, we conducted a deep-learning-based analysis of FDG PET-CT from a large retrospective cohort of non-metastatic breast cancer patients, evaluating prognostic value from multiple perspectives. To improve patient prognosis and risk stratification, we developed a multi-omics prognostic stratification (MOPS) model that integrates clinical data, FDG PET-CT, and corresponding medical reports using CMA and transformer-based architectures to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). To support clinical applicability, we incorporated interpretability into the model, providing causal explanations, visualization-based insights, and semantic interpretations to help clinicians understand and apply the predictions transparently. The MOPS model markedly improves survival prediction, outperforming single-omics models, TN staging, and molecular subtyping, with C-index values of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.81) for OS and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65-0.77) for DFS.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.