Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41611944›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026

Multi-omics deep learning improves FDG PET-CT-based long-term prognostication of breast cancer.

Xinglong Liang, Tianyu Zhang, Miguel Braga, Luyi Han, Maarten Donswijk, Jiaju Huang, Jinhong Song, Chunyao Lu, Xin Wang, Yuan Gao and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Xinglong Liang *Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tianyu Zhang *Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Miguel BragaDepartment of Radiology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal.
Luyi HanDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten DonswijkDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jiaju HuangFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Jinhong SongFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Chunyao LuDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Xin WangDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yuan GaoDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chunyan XiongFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics, School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yue SunFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Jun XuSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Jonas TeuwenNetherlands Cancer Institute, AI for Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter VogelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tao TanFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China. taotanjs@gmail.com.
Ritse MannDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography - computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) is increasingly used for staging of breast cancer in the primary and recurrent setting, as well as in evaluating treatment response and in follow-up. Quantitative parameters derived from the primary tumor, even in non-metastatic patients (i.e., without distant metastases but possibly with nodal involvement), have shown prognostic value. Beyond visual interpretation, quantitative evaluations may improve diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility. However, current studies often rely on predefined parameters such as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), which may overlook the high-dimensional patterns inherent in FDG PET-CT. To address this, we conducted a deep-learning-based analysis of FDG PET-CT from a large retrospective cohort of non-metastatic breast cancer patients, evaluating prognostic value from multiple perspectives. To improve patient prognosis and risk stratification, we developed a multi-omics prognostic stratification (MOPS) model that integrates clinical data, FDG PET-CT, and corresponding medical reports using CMA and transformer-based architectures to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). To support clinical applicability, we incorporated interpretability into the model, providing causal explanations, visualization-based insights, and semantic interpretations to help clinicians understand and apply the predictions transparently. The MOPS model markedly improves survival prediction, outperforming single-omics models, TN staging, and molecular subtyping, with C-index values of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.81) for OS and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65-0.77) for DFS.

Identifiers

PMID41611944
PMCPMC12921030

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.