ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
"Next-Generation Cord Blood Expansion: Bridging the Cell Dose Gap with Bioengineered Niches and Clinical Breakthroughs".
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation offers significant advantages over conventional grafts, including rapid availability, reduced graft-versus-host disease, and tolerance for HLA mismatches. However, its clinical utility remains limited by low hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) doses per unit, leading to delayed engraftment and higher graft failure rates in adults. This review synthesizes cutting-edge ex vivo expansion strategies that overcome cell dose limitations. We critically evaluate advances in cytokine cocktails (e.g., SCF/TPO/FLT3L), small-molecule modulators (UM171, SR-1, nicotinamide), Notch pathway activation, MSC co-culture systems, and bioreactor technologies. These approaches enhance HSC yields while preserving stemness. Clinical trials show that expanded products such as NiCord® and Zemcelpro® speed up neutrophil recovery (9–16 days) and raise one-year survival rates by 15–25% compared with unmanipulated units. Despite these successes, challenges persist in scalability, standardization, and long-term functional stability of expanded HSCs. Emerging synergies with gene editing, epigenetic modulators, and CAR-NK cell manufacturing offer promising avenues for next-generation platforms. By integrating biological insights with bioengineering innovations, optimized expansion protocols hold the potential to transform UCB into a universally accessible graft source, extending its therapeutic reach to diverse patient populations and hematologic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41612010What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.