Trial reportBMC women's health2026
The role of lidocaine spray in reducing pain during intrauterine device insertion.
Trial report in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07155785 (The Role of Lidocaine Spray in Reducing Pain During Intrauterine Device Application), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Role of Lidocaine Spray in Reducing Pain During Intrauterine Device Application
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe research examined whether lidocaine spray application to the cervix would decrease the pain experienced during procedures.
methodA double-blind randomised controlled trial included 294 women from July 2022 through February 2023. The study participants received either lidocaine spray (n = 147) or placebo (n = 147) through computerized randomization. The visual analogue scale measured patient pain at six distinct points throughout the procedure. The Beck scales evaluated patients’ levels of anxiety and depression. The main outcome variables consisted of pain measurements obtained during hysterometry and device insertion. The sample size was determined based on prior studies to detect a clinically meaningful difference in VAS scores. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07155785, registered on 13 March 2024.
resultsThe lidocaine spray group reported an average device insertion pain score of 4.18 ± 3.28 while the placebo group reported 4.24 ± 3.51 (p = 0.788). The pain scores during hysterometry did not differ between groups (3.44 ± 2.77 vs. 3.33 ± 2.93; p = 0.718). Both treatment groups reported severe pain to the same extent with approximately 27% of patients. The pain levels of women increased significantly when their anxiety scores were high regardless of the treatment they received (p < 0.05). Minor variations in operator technique and individual psychophysical differences may have contributed to pain perception but were equally distributed between groups.
conclusionThe application of lidocaine spray failed to provide any pain relief during intrauterine device insertion procedures. Anxiety levels directly affected how much pain patients experienced. It was understood that psychological preparation prior to the procedure may be more important than physical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.